Policy
Editorial standards
This page is what the rest of the site is written against. It is also the page to hold us to.
Every price, delivery speed and order limit published on Boostlix is read from the live catalog rather than written by hand, so a page cannot quote a rate that is not the rate charged. Nothing on this site claims bought engagement is safe, undetectable, or performed by people who will interact with your posts. Where a claim cannot be verified, the page says so instead of estimating.
Where the numbers come from
Prices, minimum and maximum order sizes, typical start times and whether a service supports refills or cancellation are read from the catalog at build time, on a schedule that refreshes every few hours. They are not typed into the page. That is a deliberate constraint rather than a convenience: a hand-written price drifts from the real one within weeks, and every SMM listing that quotes a rate it will not honour got there that way.
Where an article quotes a specific figure, it is the figure the catalog held when the article was last reviewed, and the article links to the service page rather than asking you to trust the number in the prose. If the two ever disagree, the service page is correct.
What we will not claim
There is a standard set of claims this industry makes, and we do not make any of them:
- That it is safe. Buying engagement violates the terms of service of every platform we deliver to. We say so on the FAQ, on the about page, and in the articles.
- That the accounts are real people who will engage. They will not read your captions. Anyone promising otherwise is describing something no supplier in this market can deliver.
- That it will grow your reach. Every major platform distributes by predicted engagement rather than follower count, so a larger inactive audience does not get you shown to more people.
- Invented social proof. No customer counter, no testimonials we cannot attribute, no star ratings. There is no
aggregateRatingin this site's structured data for the same reason: a rating a business assigns its own product is fabricated, whatever it is technically permitted to say.
Who writes it, and with what expertise
Articles are written in-house and published under the Boostlix name rather than invented author bylines with invented credentials. The expertise behind them is operational: we run orders through a wholesale delivery network every day, and see which services start late, which platforms filter hardest, which quantities drop and by roughly how much. That is a narrow kind of expertise and it is the only kind claimed here.
Where an article states how a platform behaves — that Spotify audits continuously, that TikTok decides distribution in the first hours, that YouTube prices differently because it filters harder — that is drawn from observed delivery behaviour across many orders, not from a leaked ranking document. No one outside these companies has one.
Review and freshness
Articles carry a publication date, and a visible last reviewed date once they have been revisited. A review means someone checked the claims against current catalog data and current platform behaviour, and either changed the article or confirmed it still holds.
We do not touch a date without touching the content. Bumping a timestamp to look fresh is a well-known trick, it is detectable, and it makes every other date on the site worthless.
Corrections
If something here is wrong, tell us through the contact page and include the URL. Factual corrections are made to the article rather than appended as a note, and the review date changes with them.
Why this page exists
Partly for you. Partly because both search engines and AI answer engines now look for a stated, machine-readable editorial policy before they treat a commercial site as a source worth quoting — this page is what the publishingPrinciples property in our structured data points at. A site that cannot state what it refuses to claim is not a site whose claims mean anything.